妙思文献管理集成系统WWW检索

书目信息

表格格式
工作单格式
卡片格式

书名：	Power versus prudence
作者：	T.V. Paul.
分册号：
分册名：
出版地：	Montreal :
出版社：	McGill-Queen's University Press
出版时间：	c2000.
页数：	viii, 227 p. ;
开本：	23 cm.
丛书名：
中图分类号：
科图分类号：
其他分类号：	H31:D815
主题词：
电子资源：

000	03225 22000005534500 00
001	E1233269733
003	OCoLC
005	20121019091833.53
008	991221s2000 quc b 001 0 eng
010		@a2001411311
015		@aC00-900058-5
020		@a0773520864 (bound) :@c$55.00.
020		@a0773520872 (pbk.) :@c$24.95.
040		@aNLC@beng@cNLC@dTXA@dOCLCQ@dDLC@dWSL@dDAY
055	01	@aU264
055	3	@aU264@bP38 2000
055	00	@aU264@bP38 2000
082	0	@a327.1/747@221
090		@aU264@b.P38 2000
099		@dH31:D815@e4
100	1	@aPaul, T. V
245	10	@aPower versus prudence :@bwhy nations forgo nuclear weapons / @cT.V. Paul.
260		@aMontreal :@bMcGill-Queen's University Press,@cc2000.
300		@aviii, 227 p. ;@c23 cm.
490	1	@aForeign policy, security and strategic studies
500		@aIncludes index
500		@aPublished for the Centre for Security and Foreign Policy Studies and The Teleglobe+Raoul-Dandurand Chair of Strategic and Diplomatic Studies
504		@aIncludes bibliographical references: p. [195]-217
520		@aWith the end of the Cold War, nuclear non-proliferation has emerged as a central issue in international security relations. While most existing works on nuclear proliferation deal with the question of nuclear acquisition, T.V. Paul explains why some states -- over 185 at present -- have decided to forswear nuclear weaponseven when they have the technological capability or potential capability to develop them, and why some states already in possession of nuclear arms choose to dismantle them. Paul develops a prudential-realist model, arguing that a nation's national nuclear choices depend on specific regional security contexts: the non-great power stales most likely to forgo nuclear weapons are those in zones of low and moderate conflict, while nations likely to acquire such capability tend to be in zones of high conflict and engaged in protracted conflicts and enduring rivalries. He demonstrates that the choice to forbear acquiring nuclear weapons is also a function of the extentof security interdependence that states experience with other states, both allies and adversaries
650	0	@aSecurity, International
650	0	@aNuclear weapons@xGovernment policy
650	0	@aNuclear nonproliferation
650	0	@a英语
710	2	@aTeleglobe Raoul-Dandurand Chair of Strategic and Diplomatic Studies
710	2	@aUniversit? du Qu閎ec ? Montr閍l.@bCentre d'閠udes des politiques 閠rang鑢es et de s閏urit?
830	0	@aForeign policy, security, and strategic studies
945		@aos4ug@bb5288902@ci36980280@sN
945		@amu3ug@bb2796447@ci36851441@sN
945		@ajc2ug@bb1364752@ci37497107@sN
945		@aob2bg@bb2092940@ci37570170@sN
945		@abg1ug@bb2481733@ci37719913@sN
945		@ays2ug@bb1865374@ci37739332@sN
945		@afc2bg@bb2221658@ci38167403@sN@q!
945		@aci3ug@bb3413739@ci38488891@sN
945		@amv4bg@bb1082806@ci38849068@sN
945		@aws3ug@bb2209113@ci39036377@sN
945		@ada3ug@bb1883409@ci40080434@o1@sN
945		@aou4ug@bb3096155@ci37052438@sN
945		@aca2ug@bb2627145@ci37497724@sN

Power versus prudence : : why nations forgo nuclear weapons / / T.V. Paul.-Montreal : : McGill-Queen's University Press, , c2000.

viii, 227 p. ; ; 23 cm.- (Foreign policy, security and strategic studies )

Includes index .-Published for the Centre for Security and Foreign Policy Studies and The Teleglobe+Raoul-Dandurand Chair of Strategic and Diplomatic Studies .-Includes bibliographical references: p. [195]-217 .-With the end of the Cold War, nuclear non-proliferation has emerged as a central issue in international security relations. While most existing works on nuclear proliferation deal with the question of nuclear acquisition, T.V. Paul explains why some states -- over 185 at present -- have decided to forswear nuclear weaponseven when they have the technological capability or potential capability to develop them, and why some states already in possession of nuclear arms choose to dismantle them. Paul develops a prudential-realist model, arguing that a nation's national nuclear choices depend on specific regional security contexts: the non-great power stales most likely to forgo nuclear weapons are those in zones of low and moderate conflict, while nations likely to acquire such capability tend to be in zones of high conflict and engaged in protracted conflicts and enduring rivalries. He demonstrates that the choice to forbear acquiring nuclear weapons is also a function of the extentof security interdependence that states experience with other states, both allies and adversaries

ISBN 0773520864 (bound) :$55.00.

With the end of the Cold War, nuclear non-proliferation has emerged as a central issue in international security relations. While most existing works on nuclear proliferation deal with the question of nuclear acquisition, T.V. Paul explains why some states -- over 185 at present -- have decided to forswear nuclear weaponseven when they have the technological capability or potential capability to develop them, and why some states already in possession of nuclear arms choose to dismantle them. Paul develops a prudential-realist model, arguing that a nation's national nuclear choices depend on specific regional security contexts: the non-great power stales most likely to forgo nuclear weapons are those in zones of low and moderate conflict, while nations likely to acquire such capability tend to be in zones of high conflict and engaged in protracted conflicts and enduring rivalries. He demonstrates that the choice to forbear acquiring nuclear weapons is also a function of the extentof security interdependence that states experience with other states, both allies and adversaries

●

序号	登录号	条形码	馆藏地/架位号	状态	备注
1	0005336	300053368	西文书库/4110790105/ [索取号:H31:D815/4]	在馆